Seattle Bubble has moved! Redirecting...

You should be automatically redirected. If not, visit http://seattlebubble.com/blog/and update your bookmarks.

Off-topic comment? Interesting link?
Head over to the forums, or click here for open threads.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Latest Condo Conversion: Smith Tower?

If the owner of the Smith Tower gets what they want, you can add yet another condo to dozens already planned for downtown's future. Walton Street Capital is hoping to convert the Smith Tower into condos:

Ninety-three years after Pioneer Square's Smith Tower was built as an elegant business address, its new owner hopes to turn the 38-story landmark into residential condominiums.

Chicago-based Walton Street Capital filed papers with the city Wednesday to begin what could be a months-long process of getting approval to redo the tower as housing.

It seems that living in old buildings is more charming — and practical — than working in them.
...
"We bought it, frankly, as an office building, and it wasn't until we found out we would lose the two largest tenants in the building that we really looked carefully at what our options were," [Walton Street representative Michael] Allmon said. "We've just become excited about the possibility of changing its use.

"It's important that all possible current and future uses be explored in the preservation of this iconic tower," he added.
...
Allmon believes a condominium-ized Smith Tower would have little trouble competing with the dozen or so swank condo developments under construction in downtown Seattle.

"I think this really is a category unto itself," he said.
I personally think it would be pretty awesome to live in the Smith Tower (that is of course if I worked anywhere near downtown). It's always been one of my favorite buildings in Seattle. I made a crude LEGO model of it (crude compared to this one), and it is featured prominently in the only painting my wife and I own.

On the other hand, they'll most likely be ridiculously expensive luxury condos, far out of reach for most people, and besides that, does downtown Seattle really need yet another tower full of condos, on top of the 49 others in the works? Really?

(Amy Martinez & Elizabeth Rhodes, Seattle Times, 02.22.2007)

8 comments:

christiangustafson said...

I saw this in my old hometown, Chicago, while visiting over Labor Day. It shocked me quite a bit to see so many once-productive office buildings converting to condos. So many tacked on little balconies above Washington St downtown. And I lived in the Loop for 7 years, 45th floor of Marina City. But these were office buildings changing over, everywhere, HUGE bubble there.

It's like Chicago was in transition to a California state of being, where we don't have jobs or offices or do work anymore, we just swap price-inflated assets every 2 years. Is there something wrong with Smith Tower hosting law offices, architects, and web companies?

I'll send a couple of pix to Ben's blog tonight. 55 E. Monroe was the most shocking. It's a modern office building, about the last place you'd ever want to live.

Unknown said...

Whatever happened to "highest and best use"? Have the fundamentals of land use changed along with the shift to the new (housing) economy?

Matthew said...

Pioneer square is pretty ghetto. That is a cool building though...

The Tim said...

Nothing like spending $950K for a 2 bedroom condo and feeling like you should be packing a piece with you when you leave to hit the 7-eleven up the street for a Big Gulp.

How appropriate that the "Smith" in Smith Tower is the same Smith of Smith & Wesson fame.

Eleua said...

TIM,

You are a true renaissance man. The whole time I thought it was the Anna Nicole tower.

Pegasus said...

Tim...."How appropriate that the "Smith" in Smith Tower is the same Smith of Smith & Wesson fame."

I had never heard that. Are you sure? Link please.

That tower is loved by many and some of the many smoked weed on the top while overlooking Seattle with their mates. God knows what else went on.

I would think if it was done right the place would surely command a premium.

The Tim said...

Pegasus,

I had heard it a number of times, and the Seattle Times article I linked to in this post even repeats the claim (in the little info box on the right).

However, I went looking for more references, and found out that while Lyman Cornelius Smith, the Smith Tower's namesake, was indeed in the gun manufacturing business, his company was L. C. Smith Shotguns.

Here are some sources:

Syracuse Then and Now
The Honored Marque
The L.C. Smith Collectors Association

Thanks for asking, I enjoy learning new things. I hope my answer was informative to you.

I guess that means my original comment should have instead been:

How appropriate that the "Smith" in Smith Tower is the same Smith of L.C. Smith Shotguns fame.

Pegasus said...

Tim...Thanks for the info. My dad had an old LC Smith shotgun which my brother ended up with when he passed. My brother has to tell me every time I see him about the gun and how great it is. Hmmmmm Now I can tell him about the Smith Tower and what really goes on up there, ta hell with the shotguns. :~)